Taffie Posted February 2, 2012 Share Posted February 2, 2012 Found in a reworked environment in Berkeley County, SC. The first 3 pics may be some sort of fish mouth plate, I think I've seen it somewhere before but I could not find it again to help with the id. I don't know what the item is in the second 3 pics and the third set of pics look like some sort of seed or bean, it's 4 mm long. I've been finding several kinds of different seed/beans lately. They are very hard and sound like stone when I tap them on my teeth. Thanks in advance for the help. Taffie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coco Posted February 2, 2012 Share Posted February 2, 2012 Hi, 4th, 5th & 6th pics seems to be little species of sea urchin. Perhpas Echinocyamus, but they are broken, because there should be no hole above. ---------------------- OUTIL POUR MESURER VOS FOSSILES : ici Paréidolie : [url=https://www.thefossilforum.com/topic/144611-pareidolia-explanations-and-examples/#comment-1520032]here[/url] Ma bibliothèque PDF 1 (Poissons et sélaciens récents & fossiles) : ici Ma bibliothèque PDF 2 (Animaux vivants - sans poissons ni sélaciens) : ici Mâchoires sélaciennes récentes : ici Hétérodontiques et sélaciens : ici Oeufs sélaciens récents : ici Otolithes de poissons récents ! ici Un Greg... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taffie Posted February 2, 2012 Author Share Posted February 2, 2012 Thanks, Coco. Looks like the match the tiny spine I found the other day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TqB Posted February 2, 2012 Share Posted February 2, 2012 The first one looks rather like a rhyncholite - nautilus beak. Tarquin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plax Posted February 2, 2012 Share Posted February 2, 2012 TqB is correct about shape but the few Rhyncholites I've seen (at least here in NC eocene) are white (I know color doesn't matter much) and have no horizontal plates. Can't imagine what fish it could be either. White mini echinoid looks like juvie Protoscutella which are found in the local (to you) Martin Marrietta quarries. Could also be a crushed Echinocyamus as Coco observes. The last two are real mysteries. Am supposing that you've eliminated modern weevil bored seed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al Dente Posted February 2, 2012 Share Posted February 2, 2012 The first item looks similar to some Diodontid (Burrfish, Porcupine fish) mouth plates but yours has a sharper angle than any I've seen. I agree with juvenile echinoid for the second, most likely a sand dollar which would indicate Eocene or younger. The last is a modern seed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharks of SC Posted February 2, 2012 Share Posted February 2, 2012 TqB is correct about shape but the few Rhyncholites I've seen (at least here in NC eocene) are white (I know color doesn't matter much) and have no horizontal plates. Can't imagine what fish it could be either. White mini echinoid looks like juvie Protoscutella which are found in the local (to you) Martin Marrietta quarries. Could also be a crushed Echinocyamus as Coco observes. The last two are real mysteries. Am supposing that you've eliminated modern weevil bored seed I don't think nautilus is an option, this site is at oldest oligocene. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sixgill pete Posted February 2, 2012 Share Posted February 2, 2012 It sure resembles a mouth plate, but I have never seen one so sharp. Very interesting find, hopefully someone can give it a positive ID for you. Bulldozers and dirt Bulldozers and dirt behind the trailer, my desert Them red clay piles are heaven on earth I get my rocks off, bulldozers and dirt Patterson Hood; Drive-By Truckers May 2016 May 2012 Aug 2013, May 2016, Apr 2020 Oct 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TqB Posted February 2, 2012 Share Posted February 2, 2012 I don't think nautilus is an option, this site is at oldest oligocene. The age is OK, nautili aren't extinct (yet!) - I'm by no means sure this is one though. Tarquin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharks of SC Posted February 2, 2012 Share Posted February 2, 2012 The age is OK, nautili aren't extinct (yet!) - I'm by no means sure this is one though. I guess not! I guess I just always associate nautiloids with the Cretaceous deposits with ammonites and such. Considering deep-water environments hosting six gill shark remains in the Pliocene are present in Dorchester Co. (nautiloids live in a benthic environment, right?), nautilus remains may just show up, though I've never seen any in local collections. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now