Jump to content

Eutrephoceras dekayi from NSR


Planko

Recommended Posts

Hey Everyone, 

 

Has anyone found a Eutrephoceras dekayi from NSR? If so, was it only 2mm or smaller in size? I really want one but man my eyes will have a hard time finding it. 

 

Planko

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found an abstract of an article that says hatchlings were 14 mm across.

 

Landman, N.H., J.W. Grier, J.K, Cochran, J.C. Grier, J. Petersen, and W.H. Towbin. 2017. Nautilid nurseries: Hatchlings and juveniles of Eutrephoceras dekayi from the lower Maastrichtian (Upper Cretaceous) Pierre Shale of east-central Montana. Lethaia [DOI: 10.1111/let.1222]

 

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/let.12222

Edited by DPS Ammonite
  • I found this Informative 1

My goal is to leave no stone or fossil unturned.   

See my Arizona Paleontology Guide    link  The best single resource for Arizona paleontology anywhere.       

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting. I have been looking through my NSR Collectors Guide Book and has them at 2mm. At 14mm I might be able to see them. Getting old is the pits sometimes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Planko said:

Interesting. I have been looking through my NSR Collectors Guide Book and has them at 2mm. At 14mm I might be able to see them. Getting old is the pits sometimes. 

Are you looking for hatchlings only? Adults can be around a half foot across. 

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here’s three E. dekayi living chambers that I found this week in Peedee Formation of North Carolina. 
 

 

DEF267BB-ACF7-409E-A568-3FFD88BE1E93.jpeg

  • I found this Informative 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well to your south, I've found many of that species in the 1"-2.5" range.

Kco Eutrephoceras 1g Site 945 052720.jpg

  • I found this Informative 1

Grüße,

Daniel A. Wöhr aus Südtexas

"To the motivated go the spoils."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the information. It does show them at 2-3mm. Maybe they are juveniles. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe it does show them wrong which is like 100 times more likely? A reference was provided here with 14 mm minimum size. Nautilid hatchlings cannot be small, its their biology

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any chance they are confusing forams with nautiloids? Some forams look like tiny nautiloids.

 

 

50416C27-3359-4F63-A2D2-21B6B8D50873.jpeg

  • I found this Informative 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks again. I am okay with them being larger than stated. I also know just because it is printed does not make it absolute.

 

I am actually glad they are larger. I need one for my collection. Smaller, for me, are much harder to find. 

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...