Sacha Posted February 28, 2022 Share Posted February 28, 2022 Yesterday while looking for Miocene Echinoids I ran across the following piece which I almost tossed away, but the longer I looked at it, the more unusual it seemed. This section of the Peace is largely Miocene Peace River Formation and largely yields invertebrates with infrequent vertebrate fossils washed in. I tried to find a thread where @Coco and @Shellseeker discussed "Limestone algae" or something similar, but I can't exactly recall what it was. The piece in question was quite small and was found by Jack and Coco gave hime the ID. The piece I'm wondering about is quite large (relatively) and I wondered if it could be the same thing as Jack's. It definitely looks like more than a geologic oddity, but not really bryozoa ish or coral ish. Thanks for looking. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caterpillar Posted February 28, 2022 Share Posted February 28, 2022 Oyster? http://www.paleotheque.fr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plax Posted February 28, 2022 Share Posted February 28, 2022 Looks like heavily burrowed bivalve shell as caterpillar suggests. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Pristis Posted February 28, 2022 Share Posted February 28, 2022 It does seem interesting, Sacha. Please clean it up, air-abrade it if possible, and take close-up images. http://pristis.wix.com/the-demijohn-page What seest thou else In the dark backward and abysm of time? ---Shakespeare, The Tempest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coco Posted February 28, 2022 Share Posted February 28, 2022 Hi, It doesn’t look like limestone algae, here are some examples I think caterpillar and Plax are closer to the truth. Coco 1 ---------------------- OUTIL POUR MESURER VOS FOSSILES : ici Pareidolia : here Ma bibliothèque PDF 1 (Poissons et sélaciens récents & fossiles) : ici Ma bibliothèque PDF 2 (Animaux vivants - sans poissons ni sélaciens) : ici Mâchoires sélaciennes récentes : ici Hétérodontiques et sélaciens : ici Oeufs sélaciens récents : ici Otolithes de poissons récents ! ici Un Greg... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave pom Allen Posted February 28, 2022 Share Posted February 28, 2022 maybe a type of stomatolite or oncolite Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacha Posted March 1, 2022 Author Share Posted March 1, 2022 1 hour ago, Harry Pristis said: It does seem interesting, Sacha. Please clean it up, air-abrade it if possible, and take close-up images. I can try to pick some of the sand and gravel from the pores, but air abrasion is not an option. I get the impression that it is an encrusting organism though, from the impression you can see in the 2nd picture, although it isn't obvious. It looks like a thumb with a long nail stuck into play doe, or the impression of a long lost bivalve. I'll do what I can to try to present it better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shellseeker Posted March 1, 2022 Share Posted March 1, 2022 10 hours ago, Sacha said: I tried to find a thread where @Coco and @Shellseeker discussed "Limestone algae" or something similar, but I can't exactly recall what it was. The piece in question was quite small and was found by Jack and Coco gave hime the ID. Here is the thread, John The White Queen ".... in her youth she could believe "six impossible things before breakfast" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacha Posted March 1, 2022 Author Share Posted March 1, 2022 17 hours ago, Harry Pristis said: It does seem interesting, Sacha. Please clean it up, air-abrade it if possible, and take close-up images. I tried an ultrasonic cleaner to remove some of the trapped sand without much luck, but I think these relatively close and in focus pictures will help. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plax Posted March 1, 2022 Share Posted March 1, 2022 cliona bored thick oyster shell for me with the sponge borings resistant to dissolution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacha Posted March 1, 2022 Author Share Posted March 1, 2022 Confirmed by Roger Portell at the Univ of FL. I would not have believed it. Thank you everyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Pristis Posted March 1, 2022 Share Posted March 1, 2022 24 minutes ago, Sacha said: Confirmed by Roger Portell at the Univ of FL. I would not have believed it. Thank you everyone. WHAT was confirmed by Roger Portell?? http://pristis.wix.com/the-demijohn-page What seest thou else In the dark backward and abysm of time? ---Shakespeare, The Tempest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacha Posted March 1, 2022 Author Share Posted March 1, 2022 1 hour ago, Harry Pristis said: WHAT was confirmed by Roger Portell?? That everyone except me was correct that this was a large bi-valve heavily eroded.......I'm still surprised because this is the biggest mollusk remains by far I've found in this layer by a factor of 10. Shells are very infrequent and no bigger that 2 inches or so for the most part. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Pristis Posted March 1, 2022 Share Posted March 1, 2022 Thanks. I can't remember finding any large mollusks in the Peace River sediments. Mollusks I did encounter were usually silicified. But, maybe I didn't look in the right places. http://pristis.wix.com/the-demijohn-page What seest thou else In the dark backward and abysm of time? ---Shakespeare, The Tempest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacha Posted March 2, 2022 Author Share Posted March 2, 2022 1 hour ago, Harry Pristis said: Thanks. I can't remember finding any large mollusks in the Peace River sediments. Mollusks I did encounter were usually silicified. But, maybe I didn't look in the right places. That's why I have a hard time with this. Small silicified scallops, high spired gastropods and oysters not bigger than 2 inches and steinkorns of clams and small gastropods is all I've found in 2 years of pretty intensive digging in this section of river. Mollusks of any kind are not common. This thing is orders of magnitude different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plax Posted March 2, 2022 Share Posted March 2, 2022 Oysters have calcitic shells which are more resistant to dissolution. Yours is partially dissolved away though, with the cliona borings standing out in relief because they were sediment filled and indurated before more of the shell dissolved. We see this here in North Carolina but it's not common. I have some Cucculea "shells" represented by their cliona borings where you can see the steinkern through the gaps from the new Egypt Fm of NJ. It was great that you posted this fossil as it illustrates many interesting things that happened to the shell post mortem and during diagenesis. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacha Posted March 2, 2022 Author Share Posted March 2, 2022 2 hours ago, Plax said: Oysters have calcitic shells which are more resistant to dissolution. Yours is partially dissolved away though, with the cliona borings standing out in relief because they were sediment filled and indurated before more of the shell dissolved. We see this here in North Carolina but it's not common. I have some Cucculea "shells" represented by their cliona borings where you can see the steinkern through the gaps from the new Egypt Fm of NJ. It was great that you posted this fossil as it illustrates many interesting things that happened to the shell post mortem and during diagenesis. Thanks for the detailed explanation. I appreciate you taking the time to help me get it through my head. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now