Jump to content

Kem Kem Dromaeosaurid like tooth?


BirdsAreDinosaurs

Recommended Posts

Looks like a pretty good candidate for a possible Dromaeosaurid tooth to me (small, compressed, recurved, clear difference in serration size and a mesial twist) but I would welcome your opinions. The tooth is 13 mm long. Serration counts are 16 per 5mm distal ans 23 per 5 mm mesial. Thanks!

 

 

1000x750.jpeg-2.jpg

1000x750.jpeg.jpg

1000x750.jpeg-3.jpg

1000x750.jpeg-1.jpg

1000x750.jpeg-4.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well its possible that its a Dromaeosaurid "like" tooth but it could also fit being a Noasaurid we just don't know.  Lots of variations with raptor teeth most don't have a lingual twist and we cannot even confirm that they exist in the K K Group.  We know very little of most Theropod dentitions in this fauna.  Nice to have and hopefully someday we can have answers.

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a quote from Hendrickx et al. from their Spino quadrate paper, 2016

 

" Given the important morphological similarities noted by Fanti and Therrien , Hendrickx and Mateus, and Evans et al.  between the dentition of Noasauridae and Dromaeosauridae, it is indeed likely that the dromaeosaurid teeth reported by Amiot et al. and Richter et al. from the Kem Kem beds belong to Deltadromeus."

 

Lots of unknowns, just accumulate teeth of different morphologies and someday if you are young enough you might get some answers :D

  • Enjoyed 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Troodon said:

Here is a quote from Hendrickx et al. from their Spino quadrate paper, 2016

 

" Given the important morphological similarities noted by Fanti and Therrien , Hendrickx and Mateus, and Evans et al.  between the dentition of Noasauridae and Dromaeosauridae, it is indeed likely that the dromaeosaurid teeth reported by Amiot et al. and Richter et al. from the Kem Kem beds belong to Deltadromeus."

 

Lots of unknowns, just accumulate teeth of different morphologies and someday if you are young enough you might get some answers :D

Thanks! Not sure if I am young enough given the rate of new discoveries from Kem Kem, but I will keep my fingers crossed for some nice skulls with teeth ;)

 

Until I see bigger versions of this tooth type I do personally like to believe that other tooth morphologies are more likely to belong to Deltadromeus. But that is based on incomplete knowledge and wishful thinking :) And it does not exclude the possibility of smaller Noasaurids in the paleofauna. And the possibility of morphological variation between juveniles and adults and positional variations. Or perhaps Deltadromeus just had very small teeth.

 

Anyway, I am pretty happy with this tooth and will keep my eyes open for other morphologies.

Edited by BirdsAreDinosaurs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...