Jump to content

Tremarctos floridanus?


Dino Dad 81

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Another thread going on right now gets into what to make of carinae on potential cat/bear teeth and it made me want to see if you have any thoughts on this tooth. It is thought to be Tremarctos floridanus.

  • From the pleistocene of Santa Fe River, Florida
  • 2" long
  • Seems to have the Side and Posterior carinae/cusp

 

Thanks!!

 

1.thumb.jpg.4029d8885d2412b9d4cfdd07ffc7fc97.jpg

 

2.thumb.jpg.5ddf5899575c91a1cedbd7b231a3a587.jpg

 

3.thumb.jpg.d08226060f68df83f332d0d9ac6ac480.jpg

 

4.thumb.jpg.107d47b2c64eb6ee807d88f2f546fff9.jpg

 

5.thumb.jpg.859ead4728c3a5345cca17f6d9b8959b.jpg

 

6.thumb.jpg.eb3bb4b29b1dda0feca2313b4de3819d.jpg

 

7.thumb.jpg.d19b0d090cb07b980b49e48bcdaab879.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Dino Dad 81 said:

Thanks, @Harry Pristis! I suppose the Spectacled Bear or Canis Dirus was a bit more fun, but, regardless, I only bought it because of the colors and curves.

C. edwardii is honestly rarer and thus (In my opinion) cooler than Dire Wolf. Dire Wolf is... pretty snarge common, as far as pleistocene canids go.

  • I found this Informative 1

Fossils? I dig it. :meg:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Meganeura said:

C. edwardii is honestly rarer and thus (In my opinion) cooler than Dire Wolf. Dire Wolf is... pretty snarge common, as far as pleistocene canids go.

 

That's very interesting, thanks for sharing @Meganeura. I figured the bigger predator probably had the lower headcount. Perhaps there's a preservation bias.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Dino Dad 81 said:

@Meganeura Just out of curiosity, how does it stack up against T. floridanus?

Well I’ll put it this way - I’ve found 2 Tremarctos molars, 1 Ursus Americanus premolar, 1 bear partial molar. For dire wolf, I’ve found an M2, a p2, and 2 partial P4’s. For Edwardii, still none.  

  • Thank You 1

Fossils? I dig it. :meg:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Lorne Ledger said:

looks like bear to me, a bit too small for tremarctos in my opinion - could be black bear by the size

They were actually about the same size as each other. Not a significant enough size difference to go either way.

Edited by Meganeura

Fossils? I dig it. :meg:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Harry Pristis said:

Looks to me to be from a Canis edwardi.

 

caninemorphology.JPG.02d5daab14fc223ffb3e69778f30ce80.JPG232908952_carnivorecanineslabels.JPG.e2b9f5cb916340ede55fd589f454236d.JPG

I think Harry is correct, He usually is....

 

Harry,  I am kind of interested in that "lingual carina"  .  Do you have a sense of which carnivores might have that distinctive feature ?

The White Queen  ".... in her youth she could believe "six impossible things before breakfast"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are these similarly misidentified as Tremarctos floridanus? The last one looks beefier, but is smaller. Maybe a young Canis Dirus?

 

1.6"

1.jpg.c6393398cf2d98624c5993cddc2eb7ca.jpg

 

2.jpg.f884195797a4a3c5989305ce79e37cd6.jpg

 

3"

4.jpg.6e442fb1f4ab20e6221cf341faa6723b.jpg

 

3.jpg.17af93d675392358c25eff08f773e19c.jpg

 

 

1.4"

5.jpg.aa89d9bba6aefac7b6a476f574f4cda3.jpg

 

6.jpg.e935cb7d8dad933f8da5a160b6d268b7.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...