Wny_Native Posted December 3, 2023 Share Posted December 3, 2023 I examined this item for a clue for its gem like appearance. After a few minutes I determined the oblong shape was made of Agatized material. On the top portion the agate was easily identified. Turning the rock upside down the agate can be seen again. What was left of the exterior is smooth with an occasional outcrop of black rock. A google picture search first gave me a hint of the possible origin. A dinosaur egg whose shell was cracked allowed the flow of mineral rich water to fill the egg and form the inner layer. Most of the outer shell is missing but I have included a few close ups to further my theory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plantguy Posted December 3, 2023 Share Posted December 3, 2023 Welcome to the forum! good photos. Cool specimen but I think rather its a concretion retaining some of the surrounding matrix layer it was deposited in. The small circular feature in the last photo appears to be a coral fragment/section embedded in that matrix. Regards, Chris 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wny_Native Posted December 3, 2023 Author Share Posted December 3, 2023 I agree about the coral there are several other small, coral like attachments to this item so it’s not a fossil? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FranzBernhard Posted December 3, 2023 Share Posted December 3, 2023 3 hours ago, Wny_Native said: so it’s not a fossil? It is a fossil, but not an egg fossil, but a coral fossil. Franz Bernhard 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted December 3, 2023 Share Posted December 3, 2023 These extremely hard dolostone nodules are very common in some layers of strata in Western NY. Sometimes, when split open, they contain trilobite, brachiopods, gastropods, or cephalopod fossils. Not an egg, but neat fossil on the outside, and maybe some inside. 5 1 Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 IPFOTM -- MAY - 2024 _________________________________________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wny_Native Posted December 3, 2023 Author Share Posted December 3, 2023 I agree about the coral there are several other small, coral like attachments to this item so it’s not a fossil? should I have it cut in to two parts or leave as is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted December 3, 2023 Share Posted December 3, 2023 I'd give it a few whacks with a hammer. Nothing ventured, nothing gained. Sometimes they are empty. Sometimes they can contain treasures. 2 Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 IPFOTM -- MAY - 2024 _________________________________________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Kmiecik Posted December 3, 2023 Share Posted December 3, 2023 Wear safety glasses. Rocks send chips flying everywhere when hit with a hammer. 1 Mark. Fossil hunting is easy -- they don't run away when you shoot at them! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lone Hunter Posted December 4, 2023 Share Posted December 4, 2023 12 hours ago, Wny_Native said: so it’s not a fossil? 20 hours ago, FranzBernhard said: It is a fossil, but not an egg fossil, but a coral fossil. Franz Bernhard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wny_Native Posted December 10, 2023 Author Share Posted December 10, 2023 Picture with quarter to scale fossil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludwigia Posted December 10, 2023 Share Posted December 10, 2023 On 12/3/2023 at 3:36 PM, Wny_Native said: so it’s not a fossil? The dolostone (not agate) matrix is not a fossil but the petrified coral is one. This rock is not a fossilized dinosaur egg. The rocks to be found around Buffalo are anyway too old to contain any dinosaur fossils, since they hadn't yet come into existence at that time. 1 Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger http://www.steinkern.de/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now