Jump to content

Agatized egg with some outer shell left


Wny_Native

Recommended Posts

I examined this item for a clue for its gem like appearance. After a few minutes I determined the oblong shape was made of Agatized material. On the top portion the agate was easily identified.

 

Turning the rock upside down the agate can be seen again. What was left of the exterior is smooth with an occasional outcrop of black rock.

A google picture search first gave me a hint of the possible origin.

 

 A dinosaur egg whose shell was cracked allowed the flow of mineral rich water to fill the egg and form the inner layer. Most of the outer shell is missing but I have included a few close ups to further my theory.

 

 

IMG_3665.jpeg

IMG_3670.jpeg

IMG_3671.jpeg

IMG_3678.jpeg

IMG_3674.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome to the forum! good photos. 

Cool specimen but I think rather its a concretion retaining some of the surrounding matrix layer it was deposited in. The small circular feature in the last photo appears to be a coral fragment/section embedded in that matrix. 

 

Regards, Chris 

  • I found this Informative 1
  • I Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree about the coral 

there are several other small, coral like attachments to this item

so it’s not a fossil?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Wny_Native said:

so it’s not a fossil?

It is a fossil, but not an egg fossil, but a coral fossil.

Franz Bernhard

  • I Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

These extremely hard dolostone nodules are very common in some layers of strata in Western NY. 

Sometimes, when split open, they contain trilobite, brachiopods, gastropods, or cephalopod fossils.

Not an egg, but neat fossil on the outside, and maybe some inside.

  • I found this Informative 5
  • I Agree 1

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png    VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015       MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg        IPFOTM -- MAY - 2024   IPFOTM5.png.fb4f2a268e315c58c5980ed865b39e1f.png

_________________________________________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree about the coral 

there are several other small, coral like attachments to this item

so it’s not a fossil?

 

should I have it cut in to two parts or leave as is?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd give it a few whacks with a hammer.

Nothing ventured, nothing gained.

Sometimes they are empty.  Sometimes they can contain treasures.

  • I Agree 2

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png    VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015       MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg        IPFOTM -- MAY - 2024   IPFOTM5.png.fb4f2a268e315c58c5980ed865b39e1f.png

_________________________________________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wear safety glasses. Rocks send chips flying everywhere when hit with a hammer.

  • I found this Informative 1

 

 

Mark.

 

Fossil hunting is easy -- they don't run away when you shoot at them!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Wny_Native said:

so it’s not a fossil?

 

20 hours ago, FranzBernhard said:

It is a fossil, but not an egg fossil, but a coral fossil.

Franz Bernhard

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/3/2023 at 3:36 PM, Wny_Native said:

so it’s not a fossil?

The dolostone (not agate) matrix is not a fossil but the petrified coral is one. This rock is not a fossilized dinosaur egg. The rocks to be found around Buffalo are anyway too old to contain any dinosaur fossils, since they hadn't yet come into existence at that time.

  • I Agree 1

 

Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger

http://www.steinkern.de/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...