Jump to content

Dec. 20, 23 Fossil Find


Gaila

Recommended Posts

  • New Members

So this is my newest find on property I have been working since May 2023.

I am at this property several hours, several days per week.

I believe this is a sandstone possibly mixed with green clay that is found on the property.

You can see the indentations on the rock. * Rock ID app has agreed that this is a fossil. 

 

 

20231221_022230 (4).jpg 20231221_022220 (4).jpg

 

20231221_022234 (5).jpg 20231221_022200 (4).jpg

 

20231221_022225 (4).jpg 20231221_022212 (4).jpg

 

20231221_022018 (4).jpg 20231221_022031 (4).jpg

 

20231221_022001 (4).jpg 20231221_021924 (4).jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome to TFF from Austria!

 

What fossil do you think is it? I am seeing a veined rock, the indentations most probably being weathered out minerals.

 

Franz Bernhard 

  • I Agree 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I agree with Franz, rock crossed with mineral veins.

 

From the experience read on this forum for a long time, the identification applications are far from being developed, I do not even remember a positive result. Nothing will ever be worth the expert eye ;)

 

Coco

  • I Agree 2

----------------------
OUTIL POUR MESURER VOS FOSSILES : ici

Pareidolia : here

Ma bibliothèque PDF 1 (Poissons et sélaciens récents & fossiles) : ici
Ma bibliothèque PDF 2 (Animaux vivants - sans poissons ni sélaciens) : ici
Mâchoires sélaciennes récentes : ici
Hétérodontiques et sélaciens : ici
Oeufs sélaciens récents : ici
Otolithes de poissons récents ! ici

Un Greg...

Badges-IPFOTH.jpg.f4a8635cda47a3cc506743a8aabce700.jpg Badges-MOTM.jpg.461001e1a9db5dc29ca1c07a041a1a86.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as I'm concerned, human intelligence is far superior to artificial intelligence. This rock is not a fossil.

  • I Agree 4

 

Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger

http://www.steinkern.de/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, I have to agree.

This is likely another metamorphic rock. Looks like quartz veins running through this rock, which would be indicative of metamorphism.

Not seeing sandstone, here.

 

  • I found this Informative 1
  • I Agree 4

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png    VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015       MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg        IPFOTM -- MAY - 2024   IPFOTM5.png.fb4f2a268e315c58c5980ed865b39e1f.png

_________________________________________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As discussed above, applications to identify fossils are pretty notoriously unreliable at this stage.  I can see why you picked this up. This rock has interesting weathering and mineral banding.

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

AI-driven identification programs can be helpful at times but always remember, it is typically powered by analyzing an image for patterns and comparing against a database of already-identified images. It’s just trying to find any possible similarity between your rock and some random rock on the internet. Very often, you can rotate the specimen and you’ll get a totally different ID because the “image” is different. It’s great as a second opinion, but don’t blindly rely on it. A good rule of thumb: AI is an OK supplement to already extensive analysis, but not as a replacement!

  • I found this Informative 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, patelinho7 said:

AI is an OK supplement to already extensive analysis, but not as a replacement!

Exactly! It just could give you another idea, what it could be.

Franz Bernhard

  • I Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Metamorphic rock with quartz infilling a fracture

  • Thank You 1

'Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.'

George Santayana

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Out of curiosity one day, I used Google Lens on a picture I took of a nurse shark tooth I found.  Google Lens suggested it was either bed bugs or termites.  :shakehead:

  • Enjoyed 3

Fin Lover

image.png.e69a5608098eeb4cd7d1fc5feb4dad1e.png image.png.e6c66193c1b85b1b775526eb958f72df.png image.png.65903ff624a908a6c80f4d36d6ff8260.png image.png.e69a5608098eeb4cd7d1fc5feb4dad1e.png

image.png.7cefa5ccc279142681efa4b7984dc6cb.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely not a sandstone, more likely an igneous or metamorphic rock with veins of quartz crossing it.  Nice specimen but not a fossil.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
  • New Members

Hi Gaila. Something I have found very helpful is downloading the RockD app.  It tells you the geological age and rock type found at any given location.  I think you said Connecticut.  Looking on RockD, I see Jurassic bands as you move west from Hartford to Bristol and then even older rocks (Ordovician - Precambrian) as you move into Appalachians. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...