Jump to content

T-Rex or Nano


FF7_Yuffie

Recommended Posts

Hi, thoughts on this?

 

The base looks Rexy, but the tooth is quite thin rather than fat, so I am thinking it might be Nano, not Rex?

 

Any thoughts would be great. 1.2 inches, from Powder Rivery County, Hell Creek

1.jpg

2.jpg

3.jpg

4.jpg

5.jpg

6.jpg

  • Enjoyed 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think @paulyb135 would call this a T. rex, right?

'There's nothing like millions of years of really frustrating trial and error to give a species moral fibre and, in some cases, backbone' -- Terry Pratchett

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pachy-pleuro-whatnot-odon said:

I think @paulyb135 would call this a T. rex, right?

Rex was my immediate thought with the base, but the thinness of the tooth made me second guess myself, so I thought I'd best get a second opinion.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The base pinch is what determines the difference, right? 5th photo down looks like the right side of the base comes in a bit. Just an observation, because at first glance I do agree it looks more like a Rex tooth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also agree with the others that this is T. rex. The fact that the base does not have a pinch and is more round/oval makes me think rex.

  • Thank You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

100% rex

 

The pinch appearance is just the mesial carina--not the overall shape of the base. And I don't think you'll ever find a nano tooth with a CBR that close to 1.

Edited by Dino Dad 81
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...