Jump to content

Need help identifying please,


BrittanyM

Recommended Posts

I’m no expert but from the looks of the Porous surface, I’m thinking some type of bone, can anyone please help my identify this please also is there a way to tell what era from the color? 

IMG_6004.jpeg

IMG_5999.jpeg

IMG_5998.jpeg

IMG_6002.jpeg

IMG_6003.jpeg

IMG_6001.jpeg

  • Enjoyed 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Without age, location, formation etc etc,  specimen is so fragmentary that no positive id can be made other than "nondescript bone"

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome Brittany, 

Ted is correct ,  we can be magicians,  and would need more info...  In this case , I will accept your tag Mississippi as where these fossil came from..  

Also,  since we have members from all over the world,  it is just courteous to show sizes in millemeters.IMG_4820.thumb.JPG.4f51a8e21d27a029e79014ce7891cce1.JPG

 

I have hunted Florida for a long time.  Some fossils have porous cells and some do not ..  Think of osteoderms... (alligator, Glyptodon, giant armadillo),  or hoofcores or kneecaps (patellas),  or turtle /tortoise shell.  I find many fossil pieces of turtle/tortoise shell that look very similar to your first piece.

Marine Mammals have porous bones because they are lighter ... so whale, dolphin, and even sea turtles ,  which admittedly are not mammals..

 

So when you get down to little pieces, they are not identifiable ...  Mostl likely tortoise shell..

  • I found this Informative 1

The White Queen  ".... in her youth she could believe "six impossible things before breakfast"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, ted coulianos said:

Without age, location, formation etc etc,  specimen is so fragmentary that no positive id can be made other than "nondescript bone"

Tombigbee River is the location, age is what I’m looking for along with what type of bone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think there is enough there to say more than bone chunk, indeterminate.

We tend to jokingly call these chunk-o-saurs, or chunk-o-theres.

 

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png    VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015       MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg        IPFOTM -- MAY - 2024   IPFOTM5.png.fb4f2a268e315c58c5980ed865b39e1f.png

_________________________________________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Shellseeker said:

Welcome Brittany, 

Ted is correct ,  we can be magicians,  and would need more info...  In this case , I will accept your tag Mississippi as where these fossil came from..  

Also,  since we have members from all over the world,  it is just courteous to show sizes in millemeters.IMG_4820.thumb.JPG.4f51a8e21d27a029e79014ce7891cce1.JPG

 

I have hunted Florida for a long time.  Some fossils have porous cells and some do not ..  Think of osteoderms... (alligator, Glyptodon, giant armadillo),  or hoofcores or kneecaps (patellas),  or turtle /tortoise shell.  I find many fossil pieces of turtle/tortoise shell that look very similar to your first piece.

Marine Mammals have porous bones because they are lighter ... so whale, dolphin, and even sea turtles ,  which admittedly are not mammals..

 

So when you get down to little pieces, they are not identifiable ...  Mostl likely tortoise shell..

Tombigbee River is the exact location and thank you for the other information 

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Fossildude19 said:

I don't think there is enough there to say more than bone chunk, indet.

We tend to jokingly call these chunk-o-saurs, or chunk-o-theres.

 

But in fact is it bone? And possible old bone? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most likely old bone. 

You could perform a burn test to determine if it is fossilized.
Hold the bone to a flame. If it burns at all, or gives off a burnt hair type of odor, it is modern. If not, it is a fossil.

 

  • I Agree 1

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png    VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015       MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg        IPFOTM -- MAY - 2024   IPFOTM5.png.fb4f2a268e315c58c5980ed865b39e1f.png

_________________________________________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Fossildude19 said:

Most likely old bone. 

You could perform a burn test to determine if it is fossilized.
Hold the bone to a flame. If it burns at all, or gives off a burnt hair type of odor, it is modern. If not, it is a fossil.

 

Did not know that! 

  • Enjoyed 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BrittanyM said:

Tombigbee River is the exact location and thank you for the other information 

So as to age,,,  Looks like you have potential finds from the last 50 million years...

TomBigBee.thumb.jpg.0850769116f8b5aa935cabfbb5fc33ee.jpg

  • I found this Informative 2

The White Queen  ".... in her youth she could believe "six impossible things before breakfast"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Shellseeker said:

So as to age,,,  Looks like you have potential finds from the last 50 million years...

TomBigBee.thumb.jpg.0850769116f8b5aa935cabfbb5fc33ee.jpg

Awesome we have gotten some amazing pieces from here, thank you so much for this! The smaller ones are hard to identify I know but I have a (smalls collection) I try to gather the smaller ones too. Every bit of History counts! 

  • I Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, BrittanyM said:

Awesome we have gotten some amazing pieces from here, thank you so much for this! The smaller ones are hard to identify I know but I have a (smalls collection) I try to gather the smaller ones too. Every bit of History counts! 

I like small , also.  Please post some of your finds ,  Jack

smallMeg.jpg.ea99a23997bb8dadf6e5593a7b8f2db0.jpg

  • Enjoyed 2

The White Queen  ".... in her youth she could believe "six impossible things before breakfast"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Shellseeker said:

I like small , also.  Please post some of your finds ,  Jack

smallMeg.jpg.ea99a23997bb8dadf6e5593a7b8f2db0.jpg

Here is one of my very small finds also from Tombigbee River  

IMG_5995.jpeg

  • Enjoyed 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BrittanyM said:

Here is one of my very small finds also from Tombigbee River  


Nice. These are Eocene shark teeth.

  • I found this Informative 3
  • I Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Al Dente said:


Nice. These are Eocene shark teeth.

2 tigers and 1 mackerel?? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, BrittanyM said:

2 tigers and 1 mackerel?? 


Upper left is Galeocerdo eaglesomei, bottom is Physogaleus secundus, and the last might be Tethylamna.

  • I found this Informative 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BrittanyM said:

2 tigers and 1 mackerel?? 

How do you like TFF answers so far, Brittany ? It is why I love this forum...

The White Queen  ".... in her youth she could believe "six impossible things before breakfast"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Shellseeker said:

How do you like TFF answers so far, Brittany ? It is why I love this forum...

It’s very informative, I like it so far! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Al Dente said:


Upper left is Galeocerdo eaglesomei, bottom is Physogaleus secundus, and the last might be Tethylamna.

I thought so thank you 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...