Jump to content

Enchanted

Recommended Posts

  • New Members

Hello, newbie here. This is first post. Does this look like a GIANT sea cucumber?  Relative was a geologist and spent time in Italy and Columbia but was born in US, Oklahoma.  But, I do not have any information about where it came from.  There are three (3) of these.  This is the smallest (or I say shortest) at approx.  1ft or 304 mm.  Any information is appreciated!.  

 

Link to pics:  https://photos.app.goo.gl/Vcq7YWrHpu64DgYL7

 

 

IMG_20240407_085644_HDR.jpg

 

IMG_20240407_131745.jpg

 

IMG_20240407_131856_HDR.jpg

 

IMG_20240407_131942_HDR.jpg

 

IMG_20240407_131956_HDR.jpg

 

IMG_20240407_132004.jpg

 

IMG_20240407_132042_HDR.jpg

 

IMG_20240407_132201_HDR.jpg

 

IMG_20240407_133108_HDR.jpg

 

IMG_20240407_133125_HDR.jpg

 

 

 

IMG_20240407_134024_HDR.jpg

IMG_20240407_133319.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Best to post the actual pictures.  Most folks are not going to bother going to a link.

  • I Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I don’t know what it is, but it’s not a sea cucumber. It has a 6-sided structure, while sea cucumbers are rather boudin-shaped and do not fossilize in volume this way.

 

It doesn’t look like anything I’ve seen in 40 years of fossil research. It reminds me of a human fabrication, but I don’t know what to do either (sculpture ?).

 

Coco

  • I Agree 3

----------------------
OUTIL POUR MESURER VOS FOSSILES : ici

Pareidolia : here

Ma bibliothèque PDF 1 (Poissons et sélaciens récents & fossiles) : ici
Ma bibliothèque PDF 2 (Animaux vivants - sans poissons ni sélaciens) : ici
Mâchoires sélaciennes récentes : ici
Hétérodontiques et sélaciens : ici
Oeufs sélaciens récents : ici
Otolithes de poissons récents ! ici

Un Greg...

Badges-IPFOTH.jpg.f4a8635cda47a3cc506743a8aabce700.jpg Badges-MOTM.jpg.461001e1a9db5dc29ca1c07a041a1a86.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a fossil!

 

Some sort of man made clay or concrete extrusions: but why? Looks similar to extruded churros.

 

 

IMG_0602.png

Edited by DPS Ammonite

My goal is to leave no stone or fossil unturned.   

See my Arizona Paleontology Guide    link  The best single resource for Arizona paleontology anywhere.       

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could be wrong. 

But looks man made to me. 

  • I Agree 1

MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png.a47e14d65deb3f8b242019b3a81d8160.png MotM August 2023 - Eclectic Collector

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very strange specimen. The only thing that it reminds me of is Prototaxites, but it doesn't look remotely similar enough. Could be a man made clay structure.

:popcorn:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This definitely appears to be an artificial, extruded object, possible made of clay or concrete. It doesn't come close to any fossil I know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like someone's artistic interpretation of a cactus made of clay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely extruded.

 

 

Mark.

 

Fossil hunting is easy -- they don't run away when you shoot at them!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did your relative ever come to Arizona?

 

It seems that this is an attempt to create a cactus decoration such as a Saguaro. It looks like each of the six major ribs were extruded thru a separate plate since there are lines between them when viewed down in cross section. The ribs between each major rib may also have been created by a separate plate. I also would not be surprised if each major rib was created separately and then pieced together while still soft. Is that a finger print circled in red?
 

If the technique was economical I should have seen at least one here. They would fit alongside the other ubiquitous and kitschy Kokopellis and howling coyotes.

IMG_0604.png

IMG_0603.jpeg

  • I Agree 1

My goal is to leave no stone or fossil unturned.   

See my Arizona Paleontology Guide    link  The best single resource for Arizona paleontology anywhere.       

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm thinking they're some kind of one off clay yard art sculptures. As DPS Ammonite describes. The top section appears to have been hand shaped, rounded and smoothed. I see hand/finger prints also. The notches were also cut in, crudely. Then due to clay's elastic and water retention properties, the structure shrank as it dried and cracked. It was already drying when the tops were molded as those cracks show drying and a lack of elasticity. I dabble in primitive Native American style pottery replication and see those similar traits in my attempts as in these red clay pieces.

Fired, broken and roughly repaired.  It then sits on the porch with a potted cactus in it 

PXL_20240409_172611711.thumb.jpg.e281cd486d202983edc8882111cc856f.jpg

 

Pre-firing piece

 

PXL_20240409_172652710.thumb.jpg.815f9ec9a73e95073ed7529c753efaf8.jpg

 

 

Edited by SPrice
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...