Jump to content

Isurus tooth


caggis

Recommended Posts

  • New Members

I have acquired this mako tooth, it is from the Oligocene and comes from Summerville, SC.  In your opinion is the species desori of retroflexus? Thanks in advance! 

Screenshot_20240705_201704_edit_5358206361626.jpg

Screenshot_20240705_201655_edit_5340081060164.jpg

  • Enjoyed 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

I believe Isurus are Miocene or younger, not Oligocene.

 

Edited by Fin Lover
Clarification

Fin Lover

image.png.e69a5608098eeb4cd7d1fc5feb4dad1e.png image.png.e6c66193c1b85b1b775526eb958f72df.png image.png.65903ff624a908a6c80f4d36d6ff8260.png image.png.e69a5608098eeb4cd7d1fc5feb4dad1e.png

image.png.7cefa5ccc279142681efa4b7984dc6cb.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • New Members

I am no expert, in fact I am new to collecting shark teeth.  However most sources seem to agree that Isurus was an established genus in the Oligocene, in fact their ancestor Macrorhizodus dates back to the Eocene. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Sorry, let me rephrase that.  The genus itself may have originated in the late Paleocene, but the oxyrinchus and retroflexus that you find in Summerville are coming out of Miocene-Pliocene formations (or reworked in Pleistocene lag deposits)...at least, according to everything I've read and from personal experience.  If you have something stating otherwise, I'd love to read it...the more I can learn about the area, the better.  

 

  

Edited by Fin Lover

Fin Lover

image.png.e69a5608098eeb4cd7d1fc5feb4dad1e.png image.png.e6c66193c1b85b1b775526eb958f72df.png image.png.65903ff624a908a6c80f4d36d6ff8260.png image.png.e69a5608098eeb4cd7d1fc5feb4dad1e.png

image.png.7cefa5ccc279142681efa4b7984dc6cb.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • New Members

Thank you I was not aware of this! I am from Italy, have never been to the area and have no in depth geologic knowledge of it. As I said this is new for me.  I purchased this tooth online, could the information about it have been inaccurate? What do you think it could be then? An upper narrow hastalis perhaps? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's an Isurus, I just doubt that it came out of an Oligocene formation.  Summerville is a mess/mix of formations and epochs, so it's easy to get formations wrong there, especially since a lot of fossils are found ex-situ.  From what I've heard, some sellers just use the Chandler Bridge Formation (Oligocene) as a catch-all for teeth found in the area, even if it's not accurate.

 

Fin Lover

image.png.e69a5608098eeb4cd7d1fc5feb4dad1e.png image.png.e6c66193c1b85b1b775526eb958f72df.png image.png.65903ff624a908a6c80f4d36d6ff8260.png image.png.e69a5608098eeb4cd7d1fc5feb4dad1e.png

image.png.7cefa5ccc279142681efa4b7984dc6cb.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • New Members

Do you think this is a longfin? It was listed as desori but it seems very broad to me.  I do not understand how to properly recognize shortfin and longfin teeth.  There seems to be a great deal of overlap especially for anterior teeth.  I have read about the ridge on the labial side but it is not very clear from the photos I have seen. Could you offer some insight on how to differentiate them? Thanks again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say oxyrinchus (desori)

  • I Agree 1

Fin Lover

image.png.e69a5608098eeb4cd7d1fc5feb4dad1e.png image.png.e6c66193c1b85b1b775526eb958f72df.png image.png.65903ff624a908a6c80f4d36d6ff8260.png image.png.e69a5608098eeb4cd7d1fc5feb4dad1e.png

image.png.7cefa5ccc279142681efa4b7984dc6cb.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...