Jump to content

Please help identify


cstockton

Recommended Posts

  • New Members

These were a surface find in SW Kansas. Doing an image search, most of the teeth suggest young mosasaur, but the last photo with the 2 shark-like teeth kinda throws a wrench in that line of thought.

Any help would be appreciated. 

20240706_205117.jpg

20240706_205105.jpg

20240706_210731.jpg

20240706_210723.jpg

  • Enjoyed 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@pachy-pleuro-whatnot-odon  @Jared C @LSCHNELLE

 

@JohnJ @BrennanThePaleoDude  @Praefectus  @jnoun11

 

Can we get all sides views of the last item - Top, bottom, front, back, right side, left side?

  • I found this Informative 1
  • Enjoyed 1

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png    VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015       MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg        IPFOTM -- MAY - 2024   IPFOTM5.png.fb4f2a268e315c58c5980ed865b39e1f.png

_________________________________________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • New Members

I am no longer on site, but I will upload

more pictures as soon as I can

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not much diagnostic material to go off of apart from the premaxilla and the verts 

1 hour ago, cstockton said:

but the last photo with the 2 shark-like teeth kinda throws a wrench in that line of thought.

 

Those look like zygosphene processes of the vertebra to me, not teeth. The existence of those would eliminate two sub-families off the bat, since Halisaurinae and Tylosaurinae lack zygosphenes and zygantra.

 

That leaves the Mosasaurines and Plioplatecarpines. WIth not much more to go off of apart from the pre-maxilla, I can't help but notice the premax is very broad, and quite suggestive of a well known species in the Kansas chalk, Platecarpus tympaniticus (below). Note that P. ictericus has been synonymized with P. tympaniticus, so don't be confused by the labeling. 

 

muzzle1.jpg.4260062287260196671724695774bc7e.jpgFHSMVP17017A.thumb.jpg.239feca17a8861970e77f16ea30c23d2.jpgvp2296a.jpg.c27bed69b73222507396770e9e39721e.jpg

  • I found this Informative 6

“Not only is the universe stranger than we think, it is stranger than we can think” -Werner Heisenberg 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • New Members

It looked similar to the others I have circled here, but they looked different enough that I thought they might be teeth. 

Platecarpus had come up in my searches, so that makes perfect sense.

I apologize for the quality of the pictures. I've never found anything like this before, and only rinsed the majority of the mud off before grabbing my phone, which had been left behind. This wasn't what I went out looking for.

20240706_210731.jpg

  • Enjoyed 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What you have found is marvelous.  To me is seems like a remarkable amount of associated bones.  You may want to take your finds to a museum.  Often vertebrae on mosasaurs can be identified  to species/ genus by ratios of length and condyle width and depth.  Somebody from the museum or university might want to go out with you and see if there are any more associated bones to be found.  

  • I Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • New Members

I found them on my brother in law's property. I left everything there for he and his wife to look at, along with directions to where I found it. Not far from there, I found what I believe to be enchodus vertebrae. I went out looking for agates and petrified wood, I was extremely surprised by what I found. I have walked that area quite a few times over the last few years and usually ended up finding a handful of "pretty rocks" for my grandkids.

20240705_174026.jpg

  • Enjoyed 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

if your brother in law is willing I really would ask if a paleontologist can come looking with you.  Even if fossils are found they belong to the land owner and he can do or not do what he wants with them (human remains are a different story) so he need not fear losing control of his land.  But reasonably intact mosasaurs are often scientifically valuable and you have found almost a dozen vertebrae and a large part of the jaws so this fossil may mean something.  The enchodus would be expected in that same time period (Late Cretaceous).

  • Enjoyed 1
  • I Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that you have made some beautiful and interesting discoveries. The jaw deserves to be restored, by you or by someone more competent if necessary. If I were you, I would try to search again in the same place because I think you can make other discoveries, even if I noticed that this is not what interests you :Wink1:

 

Coco

----------------------
OUTIL POUR MESURER VOS FOSSILES : ici

Ma bibliothèque PDF 1 (Poissons et sélaciens récents & fossiles) : ici
Ma bibliothèque PDF 2 (Animaux vivants - sans poissons ni sélaciens) : ici
Mâchoires sélaciennes récentes : ici
Hétérodontiques et sélaciens : ici
Oeufs sélaciens récents : ici
Otolithes de poissons récents ! ici

Un Greg...

Badges-IPFOTH.jpg.f4a8635cda47a3cc506743a8aabce700.jpg Badges-MOTM.jpg.461001e1a9db5dc29ca1c07a041a1a86.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • New Members

I have always loved rocks and fossils, I just wasn't expecting to find anything like this. My father used to take us hunting for dinosaur bone in central Utah and I had a pretty good mineral collection as a child.

My brother in law has found arrowheads and other small artifacts in his fields, usually after tilling the soil. 

  • Enjoyed 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

+1 for cf. Platecarpus based on the premaxilla and tooth root shape. Nice find. 

 

On 7/8/2024 at 7:58 PM, val horn said:

But reasonably intact mosasaurs are often scientifically valuable and you have found almost a dozen vertebrae and a large part of the jaws so this fossil may mean something. 

ehhh, plioplatecarpines are a dime a dozen in Late Cretaceous marine strata. Without a frontal or quadrate, I doubt any mosasaur researcher would bother to look at the piece. 

  • I Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...