Jump to content

austinh

Recommended Posts

I found these in the Niobrara chalk in Kansas south of Oakley. At first I figured they were just jumbled fish remnants, but upon cleaning they appear to be crushed thin walled bone, which I have read is an indicator of pterosaur fossils. Can anyone confirm or deny this assessment? I don't imagine there is enough here to determine anything more than simply pterosaur, but any information anyone can give would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. 

 

IMG_7539.jpg

IMG_7540.jpg

IMG_7542.jpg

IMG_7541.jpg

IMG_7544.jpg

IMG_7543.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cropped, rotated, and contrasted:

 

IMG_7540.jpg.1cc1cb9cf0c6762c0e3ab91ced047691.jpg

 

IMG_7539.jpg.e491a97e55a9c2dbf9c81025e2916869.jpg

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png    VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015       MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg        IPFOTM -- MAY - 2024   IPFOTM5.png.fb4f2a268e315c58c5980ed865b39e1f.png

_________________________________________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see anything recognizable here.

The items you are holding all look blurry to me.  :(

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png    VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015       MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg        IPFOTM -- MAY - 2024   IPFOTM5.png.fb4f2a268e315c58c5980ed865b39e1f.png

_________________________________________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Fossildude19 said:

I don't see anything recognizable here.

The items you are holding all look blurry to me.  :(

I-phone woes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Always best to NOT hold fossils, to photograph them, as this almost always causes blurring.

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png    VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015       MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg        IPFOTM -- MAY - 2024   IPFOTM5.png.fb4f2a268e315c58c5980ed865b39e1f.png

_________________________________________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks a lot like selenite, not a fossil in my opinion.

Crushed bone should still be smooth fragments on both sides, not all jumbled fragments on one side.

Edited by ynot

:Cry:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

took some minutes with the pics to identify, but, cannot see Pterosaur-remains or clear bones..., sorry

Edited by rocket
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rocket said:

took some minutes with the pics to identify, but, cannot see Pterosaur-remains or clear bones..., sorry

it does pass the lick test, do non fossils also stick sometimes? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, austinh said:

it does pass the lick test, do non fossils also stick sometimes? 

As far as I know from own experience it works at is best with modern or ice-age-bones. About petrified bones..., I did not try to often because normally it was clear. Might be other members of TFF have more experience with the lick test at petrified bones and sediments

Edited by rocket
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, austinh said:

it does pass the lick test, do non fossils also stick sometimes? 

The "lick test" will only prove a rock is porous - not if it is a fossil or something else.

It is a old joke that is used to get people to lick rocks.

  • I Agree 3

:Cry:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ynot said:

 

It is a old joke that is used to get people to lick rocks.

it worked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, austinh said:

it worked.

Millions of times.:default_rofl:

  • Enjoyed 1

:Cry:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...