Mr.Waffles Posted August 10 Share Posted August 10 (edited) See what I did there? 😉... Now that we established that I'm hilarious, let me show off my turd. I found what I believe to be two coprolite specimens in Arizona. Neither are very large and one appears to have a number tiny broken up fossil inclusions in it.  They both look like other examples I've seen online but I'd love to hear what you guys think. Did I actually find a couple of forbidden "dino nuggets"?   Edited August 10 by Mr.Waffles Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DPS Ammonite Posted August 10 Share Posted August 10 What age and what formation are they from. Locality? My goal is to leave no stone or fossil unturned.  See my Arizona Paleontology Guide   link The best single resource for Arizona paleontology anywhere.    Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludwigia Posted August 10 Share Posted August 10 Yes, I agree with the above. Please be more specific about both stratigraphy and locality. Your tags are rather misleading. Â Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger http://www.steinkern.de/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hadrosauridae Posted August 10 Share Posted August 10 The shape is basically correct, and at least one looks to have inclusions which is important for positively IDing as coprolite. Can post some clear CLOSE photos? No hands, fingers, etc. Professional fossil preparation services at Red Dirt Fossils, LLC.  https://reddirtfossils.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Waffles Posted August 10 Author Share Posted August 10 Idk about the age but it was north of Phoenix, up in the mountains. Northern Arizona. There was some chert, and lots of hematite in the general area. I'll try to post some clearer pictures later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Waffles Posted August 10 Author Share Posted August 10 Someone suggested the age was paleozoic another said maybe devonion but I couldn't really tell you. That's why I tagged both lol. Maybe it's neither of those? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Waffles Posted August 10 Author Share Posted August 10 2 hours ago, hadrosauridae said: The shape is basically correct, and at least one looks to have inclusions which is important for positively IDing as coprolite. Can post some clear CLOSE photos? No hands, fingers, etc. I uploaded more photos. These are about as close as I can get Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now