Jump to content

Can a Fossil be Quartz ?


Clintols

Recommended Posts

  • New Members

I’m batting a 1000 with my identifications. This I know will continue my streak I’m sure. However I need to know if fossils can become crystal. Can a bone and tissue become quartz?

IMG_2297.jpeg

IMG_2296.jpeg

IMG_2287.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope.

This is definitely a rock, and not a fossil.

  • I Agree 2

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png    VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015       MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg        IPFOTM -- MAY - 2024   IPFOTM5.png.fb4f2a268e315c58c5980ed865b39e1f.png

_________________________________________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fossils cannot be quartz because of the conditions necessary for quartz to form. Check the Wikipedia listing for quartz for more info.

  • I found this Informative 1

 

 

Mark.

 

Fossil hunting is easy -- they don't run away when you shoot at them!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fossils can become silicified, i.e. turned into quartz or "achatized" due to a process called permineralization. The sample you are showing us is in my opinion however not a fossil.

  • I found this Informative 2
  • I Agree 2

 

Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger

http://www.steinkern.de/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i agree that this particular rock is not a fossil, and that this isn't how a fossil preserved as quartz would look but it is not correct to say fossils cannot be preserved as quartz or even that it's uncommon. agatized fossils are very common. I cant speak for bones since most my fossils are shells due to living underwater but flint is a type of quartz and thats one of the most common types of rocks to find sea urchins in. even if strictly dealing with crystallized quartz ive seen a fair few of those

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, anonaddict said:

i agree that this particular rock is not a fossil, and that this isn't how a fossil preserved as quartz would look but it is not correct to say fossils cannot be preserved as quartz or even that it's uncommon. agatized fossils are very common. I cant speak for bones since most my fossils are shells due to living underwater but flint is a type of quartz and thats one of the most common types of rocks to find sea urchins in. even if strictly dealing with crystallized quartz ive seen a fair few of those

 

This is a bit of a misstatement.

 

Chert/Flint are Cryptocrystaline rocks, and Quartz is a crystaline mineral, but they are not quite the same.

So, it is incorrect to say quartz can make up fossils.

 

Chert and flint start out as Sedimentary rocks, but Quartz does not. That is why you can find fossils in chert or flint. Fossils form in Sedimentary rocks.

Can they become agatized, chertified, or be covered in beekite (a form of Chalcedony) yes, but not quartz.

 

In science it is best to be as specific as possible. I may be spitting hairs, but there are so many types of quartz and crystal structures, that it is best to be as clear as possible.

 

So, no fossils in quartz. 

  • I found this Informative 2

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png    VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015       MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg        IPFOTM -- MAY - 2024   IPFOTM5.png.fb4f2a268e315c58c5980ed865b39e1f.png

_________________________________________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Fossildude19 said:

but not quartz

Now I am going to split a hair ;).

 

What about those famous silicified fossils some members here are regularly etching out of limestone?

 

Franz Bernhard

 

 

  • I Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Rockwood said:

A fossil composed of quartz would have to be a natural cast, or a geodized fossil. 

 

45 minutes ago, FranzBernhard said:

Now I am going to split a hair ;).

 

What about those famous silicified fossils some members here are regularly etching out of limestone?

 

Franz Bernhard

 

 

If actual crystals formed, would it not qualify as a natural cast? I'm not sure where the distinction between it and replacement would be drawn though. 

  • I Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FranzBernhard said:

Now I am going to split a hair ;).

 

What about those famous silicified fossils some members here are regularly etching out of limestone?

 

Franz Bernhard

 

 

 

 

I'm not a geologist, so I can't really answer other than to say, not all silicates are quartz, but quartz is a silicate.   :shrug:

  • Thank You 1

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png    VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015       MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg        IPFOTM -- MAY - 2024   IPFOTM5.png.fb4f2a268e315c58c5980ed865b39e1f.png

_________________________________________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Fossildude19 said:

Chert/Flint are Cryptocrystaline rocks,

 

I'm sorry, but I beg to differ. If you read the link you gave us, at the end of the first paragraph you'll notice that the cryptocrystalline crystals in chalcedony are defined as quartz crystals.

  • I found this Informative 1
  • I Agree 1

 

Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger

http://www.steinkern.de/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ludwigia said:

If you read the link you gave us, at the end of the first paragraph you'll notice that the cryptocrystalline crystals in chalcedony are defined as quartz crystals.

Yeah, you can use petrographic or mineralogical nomenclature on these things.

 

What is calcite marble? A rock composed sometimes almost entirely of calcite. In a collection, the same piece could rest in a petrographic collection as "calcite marble" or in a mineralogical collection as "massive calcite". At least in my opinion ;).

 

Fran Bernhard

  • Enjoyed 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Ludwigia said:

 

I'm sorry, but I beg to differ. If you read the link you gave us, at the end of the first paragraph you'll notice that the cryptocrystalline crystals in chalcedony are defined as quartz crystals.

 

 

Hm. Did not see that in my haste.    :blush:

However, it IS from Wikipedia.(not always the most accurate information.)   So I can't really vouch for the veracity of THAT part of the statement.

 

I can only say silica SiO2 is different from quartz SiO4.

 

And I will stand by my assessment of this rock being quartz and not a fossil. :shrug:

 

 

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png    VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015       MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg        IPFOTM -- MAY - 2024   IPFOTM5.png.fb4f2a268e315c58c5980ed865b39e1f.png

_________________________________________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Fossildude19 said:

 

 

Hm. Did not see that in my haste.    :blush:

However, it IS from Wikipedia.(not always the most accurate information.)   So I can't really vouch for the veracity of THAT part of the statement.

 

I can only say silica SiO2 is different from quartz SiO4.

 

And I will stand by my assessment of this rock being quartz and not a fossil. :shrug:

 

 

i think we are all in agreement on this specimen being quartz and not a fossil, the conversation just moved to a more general perspective on whether fossils can be preserved as quartz.

 

agree on wikipedia, i find myself often using it due to its high placement in search results but it is not reliable, text books written by experts are way more reliable

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Fossildude19 said:

I can only say silica SiO2 is different from quartz SiO4.

Silica is a chemistry term for the compound SiO2.

 

Quartz is also SiO2. But you are right, quartz is structurally composed of SiO4-tetrahedrea forming a framework, with oxygens shared by two silicons.

Franz Bernhard

Edited by FranzBernhard
  • I found this Informative 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, FranzBernhard said:

Silica is a chemistry term for the compound SiO2.

 

Quartz is also SiO2. But you are right, quartz is structurally composed of SiO4-tetrahedrea forming a framework, with oxygens shared by two silicons.

Franz Bernhard

ohh that makes sense, and that is why crystals have repeating structures?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that quartz is SiO2.

 

Coco

 

----------------------
OUTIL POUR MESURER VOS FOSSILES : ici

Pareidolia : here

Ma bibliothèque PDF 1 (Poissons et sélaciens récents & fossiles) : ici
Ma bibliothèque PDF 2 (Animaux vivants - sans poissons ni sélaciens) : ici
Mâchoires sélaciennes récentes : ici
Hétérodontiques et sélaciens : ici
Oeufs sélaciens récents : ici
Otolithes de poissons récents ! ici

Un Greg...

Badges-IPFOTH.jpg.f4a8635cda47a3cc506743a8aabce700.jpg Badges-MOTM.jpg.461001e1a9db5dc29ca1c07a041a1a86.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, anonaddict said:

and that is why crystals have repeating structures?

Other way around ;):

- When the SiO4-tetrahedra form an ordered, periodic, repeating network / structure, you have a crystal with an XRD-pattern with sharp reflections.

- When the SiO4-tetrahedra form an irregular, chaotic(??) network /structure, you have SiO2-glass with no sharp reflections in XRD.

- There are also things in between, semiordered states, of course.

Franz Bernhard

Edited by FranzBernhard
  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't add much to the mineral makeup conversation but did have a piece that I pulled out for another thread with an example of what I had previously considered permineralization by quartz.  Now I'm not sure. 

 

The white structure does shimmer, but I had a hard time getting the lighting right to pick that up.

PXL_20240917_010925802~2.jpg

PXL_20240917_010949782~2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...