Fish

[Moth.11]

Unknown localization and unknown size. 

What species is it? 

I i don' t have another photo.

[Fossildude19]

Without a better photo, and no location information, it can only be called an indeterminate fish.

[Moth.11]

4 minutes ago, Fossildude19 said:

Without a better photo, and no location information, it can only be called an indeterminate fish.

Knightia? 

[Fossildude19]

Unclear from Poor Quality photo.
Not able to make ID from bad photo.

[jpc]

21 minutes ago, Moth.11 said:

Knightia? 

maybe... maybe not.  We really need a better photo. 

[FossilDAWG]

How does "...it can only be called an indeterminant fish." suggest Knightia to you?  The photo is extremely poor, and you provide no locality or age data.  Nothing can be said about this photo beyond "it's a fish".

 

Don

[Moth.11]

20 minutes ago, FossilDAWG said:

How does "...it can only be called an indeterminant fish." suggest Knightia to you?  The photo is extremely poor, and you provide no locality or age data.  Nothing can be said about this photo beyond "it's a fish".

 

Don

 

The fossil fish is in a set of fossils, there are no clearer photos and it does not say what location it is from

[Fossildude19]

Just now, Moth.11 said:

 

The fossil fish is in a set of fossils, there are no clearer photos and it does not say what location it is from

 

So, the answer, given the current information and poor picture is Fish, indeterminate, as I stated earlier.

[Moth.11]

Just now, Fossildude19 said:

 

Tak więc odpowiedź, biorąc pod uwagę obecne informacje i kiepski obraz, brzmi: Ryba, nieokreślona, jak już wcześniej stwierdziłem.

Thanks. 

[FossilDAWG]

If this is something you are considering purchasing, I suggest you not spend money on anything you can't get the dealer to provide locality data and crisp clear pictures. 

 

Don