New Members Stanleon Posted yesterday at 04:41 PM New Members Share Posted yesterday at 04:41 PM (edited) Can you help me identify or confirm this? I think it is a Fasciolaria scalarina. What do you think? Edited yesterday at 04:43 PM by Stanleon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeR Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago It is a small horse conch Triplofusus giganteus. 2 "A problem solved is a problem caused"--Karl Pilkington "I was dead for millions of years before I was born and it never inconvenienced me a bit." -- Mark Twain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New Members Stanleon Posted 18 hours ago Author New Members Share Posted 18 hours ago 4 hours ago, MikeR said: It is a small horse conch Triplofusus giganteus. I thought so too, but the aperture of Triplofusus giganteus is way wider wider? Why is that? For me I found it doesn't match. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New Members Stanleon Posted 18 hours ago Author New Members Share Posted 18 hours ago (edited) 4 hours ago, MikeR said: It is a small horse conch Triplofusus giganteus. In addition, I have doubts about this (see images). The first lne with notable spine I think it is Phyllonotus globosus While the second I believe to be Chicoreus floridanus. Are my right? But the way I am a fan of your writing here on Tamiami Formation. I am currently doing a paleoenvironmental reconstruction of Units 6/7. Your write up helped alot. Please I will appreciate your response on the wider nature of aperture of Triplofusus giganteus on Google images than my image. Thank you so much Edited 18 hours ago by Stanleon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeR Posted 17 hours ago Share Posted 17 hours ago 1 hour ago, Stanleon said: I thought so too, but the aperture of Triplofusus giganteus is way wider wider? Why is that? For me I found it doesn't match. It is the sculpture--scalarina is quite different LINK. "A problem solved is a problem caused"--Karl Pilkington "I was dead for millions of years before I was born and it never inconvenienced me a bit." -- Mark Twain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeR Posted 17 hours ago Share Posted 17 hours ago 1 hour ago, Stanleon said: In addition, I have doubts about this (see images). The first lne with notable spine I think it is Phyllonotus globosus While the second I believe to be Chicoreus floridanus. Are my right? But the way I am a fan of your writing here on Tamiami Formation. I am currently doing a paleoenvironmental reconstruction of Units 6/7. Your write up helped alot. Please I will appreciate your response on the wider nature of aperture of Triplofusus giganteus on Google images than my image. Thank you so much A. Chicoreus floridanus B. Phyllonotus globosus "A problem solved is a problem caused"--Karl Pilkington "I was dead for millions of years before I was born and it never inconvenienced me a bit." -- Mark Twain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New Members Stanleon Posted 17 hours ago Author New Members Share Posted 17 hours ago 6 minutes ago, MikeR said: A. Chicoreus floridanus B. Phyllonotus globosus Thanks for your response, do you mean this image below with known spines is Chicoreus floridanus? Sorry for confusing it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anonaddict Posted 10 hours ago Share Posted 10 hours ago (edited) was this edited somehow? i only see one specimen Edited 10 hours ago by anonaddict Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New Members Stanleon Posted 8 hours ago Author New Members Share Posted 8 hours ago 1 hour ago, anonaddict said: was this edited somehow? i only see one specimen 1 specimen was initially added. Before two others were added in quotes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeR Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 11 hours ago, Stanleon said: Thanks for your response, do you mean this image below with known spines is Chicoreus floridanus? Sorry for confusing it. No need to apologize. It took a long time for me to "get it right" and I still make mistakes. Some collectors totally disagree with my approach, but I really don't care any longer. Yes, the one with the spines is C. floridanus LINK. Spine length is variable, but typically get shorter as the animal aged. Mike "A problem solved is a problem caused"--Karl Pilkington "I was dead for millions of years before I was born and it never inconvenienced me a bit." -- Mark Twain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now