New Members atko58 Posted 8 hours ago New Members Share Posted 8 hours ago Always thought this was a tooth, dinosaur or crocodilian but have been told it's more likely to be a rudist bivalve. Can't get my head round that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockwood Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago They are a little funky for a bivalve, but this is definitely a rudist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago Area found helps us narrow down the possibilities. Definitely NOT a tooth - no enamel present, and no tooth morphology. Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 IPFOTM -- MAY - 2024 _________________________________________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now