Jump to content

Fossil Plant Or Skin Impression?


LanceH

Recommended Posts

Has anyone seen a trace fossil like this? This was found just a couple feet below the Woodbine formation in North Texas (washed downhill into Grayson fm.). It appears to be an impression of some type of bark in a piece of mudstone or perhaps animal skin(?). It's about 3/4" square and flat.

post-11-1224452247_thumb.jpg

post-11-1224452264_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe I should make a positive clay impression and post that. That might be more recognisable to the fossil plant peoples.

I looked through the few pics on that link above but didn't see anything.

The piece is very flat, don't see any curve. I'm not a fossil plant person so don't know of any Cretaceous leaves or bark that could leave such a pattern in mud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Lance, I did an emboss of it in photoshop and it doesn't look like bark, it sort of looks like fish skin without the scales.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I sent your pic to a paleontologist friend. He said:

"I have not seen this before. Just on the off chance, does it have the structure of bone?

Amphibian skull has a regular patter of smooth bumps that look like a fingerprint pattern. On the broken edge, you might be able to see the marrow area. Just thinking out loud."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, an animal skin impression did cross my mind but can't see an animal leaving a clean stamped impression in wet mud unless it died there and the mud dried around it.

I sent your pic to a paleontologist friend. He said:

"I have not seen this before. Just on the off chance, does it have the structure of bone?

Amphibian skull has a regular patter of smooth bumps that look like a fingerprint pattern. On the broken edge, you might be able to see the marrow area. Just thinking out loud."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lance:

This really does not look like bark or the surface of a plant. The raised surfaces are curved, mostly circular, and almost look like the impression of shark skin (shagreen). It would be interesting to see what a clay impression of the specimen looks like. That might be more definitive. Most of the lower Woodbine that I have encountered in Denton and Tarrant counties has been terrestrial.

Regards,

Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I noticed the rounded nodes are rather smooth and there are fiberous like extensions between all of them stretching mostly in similar directions. Plant? Animal? Alien?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have seen this before, it looks like the crown of a tooth from a while back, not the one you made but the original. It was on the tooth of a reptile that feed on clams. I am not really sure of any of this, it was a long time back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest N.AL.hunter

This does look familiar to me. If you don't find the answer soon, I'll check through my collection as I unpack it. What age are those formations you mentioned? Cretaceous?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting. I'd like to know what it is too.

I can't come up with anything clever enough for my signature...yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest N.AL.hunter

Could it be fossil turtle shell? When the outer layer of the shell erodes away, it often leaves something similar to this object. See here for examples: http://www.rathbonesgifts.com/Fossil%20Turtle.htm

I know none of them are an exact match, but as I said earlier, yours does look familiar to me. Again I'll look in my collection when I get the chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, here is a clay impression of it.
looks like snake scales odd for sure. could be shed skin off off a reptile

also i have gravel for sale check the trade room or my posts. god hunting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lance, looks like a chunk of carapace from a Trionychid turtle ("soft shelled turtle"). Not uncommon for cretaceous marine deposits. I am not a turtle expert, and it is not a large enough chunk to determine species, and there are quite a few documented from the Cretaceous of Texas. Many folks get mixed up between Trionychid costal fragments and croc scutes / croc skull frags. But once you have seen lots of them, the ornamentation is a dead giveaway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok i think i have it,lepidodendron trunk , a young branch or sappling. check the web

also i have gravel for sale check the trade room or my posts. god hunting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest solius symbiosus

^It doesn't really resemble a lycopsid... maybe one of the very inner barks??? I was thinking cycadid when I first saw it, but IDK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont know what it is either, but I found this peice of pecan bark today and when I saw the underside of it, it reminded me of your fossil's clay impression. What do you think?

post-891-1224958170_thumb.jpg

I can't come up with anything clever enough for my signature...yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...