Jump to content

Bakerfield Tiger Id Help


Vball

Recommended Posts

I have looked everywhere to ID this tooth. It is from Bakersfield fire zone. I thought it was a posterior Galeocerdo aduncus but the more I look at it maybe Hammerhead??? It doesn't seem to have any serrations on any part of the tooth. I got it on Ebay. post-1286-1233793244.jpg

Thanks New Member, VBall

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest bmorefossil

welcome to the forum

can you take a bigger picture I cant really see the tooth lol

Physogaleus contortus, the serrations would be much larger on a posterior aduncus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probabably Physogaleus contortus.

Thanks for the quick response. I never thought of it being a contortus don't know why. It does make sense.

post-1286-1233802221_thumb.jpg post-1286-1233802252_thumb.jpg

Thanks again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest bmorefossil

yep im still going with what i said, the whole serrations thing can be nothing, i have posterior teeth that i dont think have serrations

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a posterior lateral contortist. I've found quite a few there.

If only my teeth are so prized a million years from now!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It may be P. contortus. S. laevissima may be a better guess.

It just doesn't look like a hammerhead tooth to me. ^_^

Tha tighin fodham, fodham, fodham!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest bmorefossil
It just doesn't look like a hammerhead tooth to me. ^_^

i think hammerhead was brought up only because of the non serrations part of it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, I don't think it's a hammerhead because of the absense of a nutrient groove when looking at the labial view. S. laevissima teeth have a pretty obvious nutrient groove. I'm also thinking tiger shark and it could be P. contortus, but I still think it could be a lateral G. aduncus tooth with worn serrations. A head on shot of the blade might confirm one or the other. My lateral P. contortus teeth look similar but they still have the "torted" blade somewhat while aduncus doesn't.

Just my two cents.

Kevin Wilson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for all of your help. I have concluded with all your help that it is indeed a contortus. After looking down at the blade, although the tooth is small there is the beginnings of a twist at the tip.

Thanks for all your help, VBall

Link to comment
Share on other sites

can you give us some more pictures?

I'm Still waiting on it to come in the mail. I'll clean it and post more pics then

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...