tracer Posted July 11, 2009 Share Posted July 11, 2009 rather than toss out what i think and bias the feedback, i'll ask what others think who've seen a bunch of probably pleistocene stuff. three different pics of two fossils. no, they're not related fossils, as far as i know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cris Posted July 11, 2009 Share Posted July 11, 2009 Tapir on the tooth. Not sure with the bone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tr-J-K Posted July 11, 2009 Share Posted July 11, 2009 Bone looks like either an astragalus or calcaneum (ankle bones) from a small to moderate sized animal. Tapir as well? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kauffy Posted July 12, 2009 Share Posted July 12, 2009 Bone looks like either an astragalus or calcaneum (ankle bones) from a small to moderate sized animal. Tapir as well? I agree, really worn...but nice find "Turn the fear of the unknown into the excitment of possibility!"We dont stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auspex Posted July 12, 2009 Share Posted July 12, 2009 I'll have to agree with tracer on this one: they're definitely three different pics of two fossils. "There has been an alarming increase in the number of things I know nothing about." - Ashleigh Ellwood Brilliant “Try to learn something about everything and everything about something.” - Thomas Henry Huxley >Paleontology is an evolving science. >May your wonders never cease! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now